Coupe du Monde de Rugby 2007


A la vue des matchs, le classement final reflète bien la valeur des équipes

Les SudAfs, 0 défaite, trop fort...
Les Britishs, on ne pouvait pas les battre (grosse défense + Wilkinson)
Les Pumas... ils nous ont mangé 2 fois

La seule injustice, les blacks qui ne sont pas dans le carré final... mais ce n’est pas moi qui va m'en plaindre, c’est notre seule satisfaction de cette CDM.

RDV dans 4 ans… :chinois:
 


finalement çà se finit bien les angais ont perdu :D

C'est toujours le meme but. Tant que les anglais ne gagnent pas c'est good. :) Hamilton n'est pas champion du monde et les anglais ont perdu la CDM en finale (!). :lol: :lol:
 





Dernier classement de l'IRB : La France tombe à la 6ème place [:chris34:7] :sweat: :sweat:

1 Afrique du sud
2 Nouvelle Zelande
3 Argentine
4 Angleterre
5 Australie
6 France

Bon bilan :sarcastic: :sarcastic:
 


Aus et NZ sorties en 1/4, et elles sont devant nous.
Alors qu'après notre victoire en 1/4, on était 2eme :lol:
 

Ouais il faut l'envoyer à bob. Moi je veux bien mais j'ai aucune photo de moi correcte. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
 



Voila la méthode dixit le site de l'irb :pt1cable: :pt1cable: :pt1cable:
Il manque dans l'équation : la hauteur du gazon et la température de la douche... mais c'est pas grave [:unclebens:8] [:unclebens:8] [:unclebens:8] .
How the IRB World Rankings are calculated

For illustration, we'll use the Six Nations match between Wales and Scotland in Cardiff on 14 February 2004, to describe the process.

Step One: Check pre match ratings


The top 10 countries in the IRB World Rankings, immediately before the match, are shown below. Wales were on a rating of 76.92 and Scotland slightly lower on 76.36.

Step Two: Allow for home advantage

To 'handicap' the home side, we treat them as though they are three points stronger than their current rating, which means that they will tend to pick up fewer points for winning, and give away more points for losing
This gives Wales a rating of 76.92 +3 = 79.92, against Scotland's rating of 76.36.
Step Three: Calculate the Rating Gap
The Rating Gap is the difference between the ratings of the two sides
Allowing for home advantage it is 79.92 - 76.36 = 3.56 (in favour of Wales).
Step Four: Check the possible Core Rating Changes
Core Rating Changes are based on the match result and the Rating Gap
As illustrated in the diagram below, with a Rating Gap of 3.56, if Wales won their Core Rating Change would be up, and Scotland's down, by 0.64



Again as illustrated below, if the game was drawn, Wales Core Rating Change would be down, and Scotland's up, by 0.36



And finally if Scotland won their Core Rating Change would be up, and Wales's down, by 1.36.



So Wales, as the higher rated side (especially allowing for home advantage) would pick up fewer points than Scotland if they won the match, and would give away more points if they lost.

Step Five: Apply weighting factors

If one side has won by more than 15 points, we multiply the Core Rating Change by 1.5. So if Wales won 30-10 the points exchange would be 0.64 x 1.5 = 0.96.
If the match was part of the World Cup Finals, we would then double the Rating Change.
What happened?
Wales won the match 23-10, so the sides exchanged 0.64 rating points, with Wales going up to 77.57 and Scotland going down to 75.72.
 

:lol:

C'est à cause de ce genre d'equation qu'ils ont mis 5 jours pour decider des maillots pour le 1/4 France NeoZed. :lol: